Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

A supermarket chain in Ireland must fork over €5,000 to a former Muslim employee after the courts deemed he was unfairly dismissed for his sexual assault conviction. It’s unclear if sexual assault perpetrators are automatically put into a protected class, but if the shoe fits, then it fits!

According to The Publica:

Supermarket chain Aldi has been forced to pay €5,000 to Mohammed Kashif, for “unfairly dismissing” him after they found out he had been convicted of sexually assaulting a former colleague.

In May of 2022, Kashif sexually assaulted mother-of-two Donna O’Loughlin as she attended her first day on the job at the Kebabish chip shop in Foynes, County Limerick. Over the course of three hours, Kashif “slid his hand over her buttocks and then slapped her buttocks quite firmly… asked her for kisses and for sex… twice grabbed her vagina.” Kashif even rubbed himself against her, asking if she could feel his erection, explained Detective Elaine O’Keefe at his sentencing hearing in December 2022.

Call me crazy but this seems like a fireable offense since he’s a liability, especially considering sexual assault used to be considered a crime.

Following his conviction, Kashif, who had a second job at Aldi, reportedly informed his store manager, who allegedly “adopted a supportive role” and failed to inform more senior staff. When the senior staff became aware in February of 2023, Kashif was dismissed, with Aldi citing concerns for the safety of other female staff.

However, Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer Pasty Doyle awarded the payment of €5,000 to Kashif, the equivalent to two month’s gross pay, finding he was unfairly dismissed.

Why does it seem as if women are almost always the ones to suffer the most from progressive ideology? Why are the “rights” of perverts more valid than protecting women in the workplace? Are we no longer fighting the patriarchy or what?

Doyle argued that there was no “sufficient connection between the crime committed and the employee’s work, in such a way that would render the employee unsuitable or capable of damaging the employer’s reputation.” She claimed that Aldi had taken “no regard” to Kashif’s “unblemished record … [nor to] the 8 weeks of uneventful service post declaration.”

What a load of nonsense.

A criminal record is something employers should be able to take into consideration, especially considering they are the ones liable if something goes wrong. Additionally, it’s morally unjustifiable that this man was awarded a settlement for sexually assaulting an innocent mother.

The fact that these people do everything in their power to protect the worst people in society is extremely telling. Even if a crime at one job should not affect another, which it should even if they think it shouldn't, why can’t they make an exception for psychos who sexually assault women? This is one of the worst crimes someone can commit and it’s deeply concerning the side officials stood on for this.

So while the left pretends to be fighting the invisible patriarchy, they are creating one worse than fake activists could have even imagined. And the fact that these people pretend to be on the compassionate side is a slap in the face to women everywhere.

- YouTubeyoutu.be