Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

A man was convicted of raping a woman in Canada. He tried to get that conviction overturned by the Supreme Court. The court held that conviction but they were not happy that the judge in the case referred to the victim as a “woman” because that is “unfortunate” and it’s “confusing.” And instead, the judge should have said “Person with a vagina.”

That is not satire. The Canadian Supreme Court degraded a rape victim as nothing more than a “person with a vagina.” It does not even look like she identifies as trans. The court is just that deranged and that asinine.

According to Reduxx:

The Supreme Court of Canada has asserted that a lower court judge should not have referred to a sexual assault victim as “a woman,” a term which they claim was “unfortunate and engendered confusion.” The ruling, published on March 8, goes on to imply that the more effective term would be “person with a vagina.”

The case being discussed was that of Christopher James Kruk, a man from Maple Ridge, British Columbia who had been convicted of sexually assaulting a woman in 2020. According to past news coverage of the initial charges, the incident occurred the night of May 26, 2017, after Kruk encountered a heavily intoxicated woman in the city’s urban center. Kruk reportedly offered to ensure the woman got home safely, and then brought her to his residence via the SkyTrain and a taxi.

The victim testified at the first trial that she woke up to find Kruk penetrating her, and that she tried and failed to push him off through her disorientation.

In his defense, Kruk claimed he never penetrated the woman, and that she had simply become startled when he had tried to wake her up, misinterpreting the sudden sensation as rape. He also claimed her pants were off because she had spilled water on them and that she had removed them herself while intoxicated earlier that evening.

Finding Kruk’s defense “fanciful,” Justice Michael Tammen found Kruk guilty of sexual assault in 2020, in part because he asserted that it would have been “extremely unlikely that a woman would be mistaken” about the feeling of penile penetration.

He was convicted and an appeals court overruled his conviction and ordered a new trial, working its way to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court of Canada has now found the appeals court erred in overturning Tammen’s conviction of Kruk, determining that Tammen had acted appropriately in the case. But despite upholding Tammen’s initial arguments, Justice Sheilah Martin took issue with Tammen’s description of the victim as “a woman.”

“Where a person with a vagina testifies credibly and with certainty that they felt penile‑vaginal penetration, a trial judge must be entitled to conclude that they are unlikely to be mistaken,” Martin wrote.

Martin, a “person with a vagina” claims it is far more respectable to call a woman that than the actual term. But the scariest part about that is someone who has such an insane way of thinking is on the Supreme Court of Canada.

“While the choice of the trial judge to use the words ‘a woman’ may have been unfortunate and engendered confusion, in context, it is clear the judge was reasoning that it was extremely unlikely that the complainant would be mistaken about the feeling of penile‑vaginal penetration because people generally, even if intoxicated, are not mistaken about that sensation.”

It is not exactly clear what is so confusing about the term “woman.”

Trying to redefine gender is shocking and abhorrent on its own. But this is a whole new level of shame that I never thought was possible.

Nearly half of the world refers to themselves as "women." No woman has ever referred to themselves as a “person with a vagina” and no one should ever do that. Because they are not a “person with a vagina." They are a woman and gender is developed before genitals are.

It is unclear who exactly the judge thinks she is appeasing with that statement. But I can assure you, it is not anyone with even a fraction of a brain.

How Canadian Doctors Are Disguising M*rder as Healthcare! MAID Explained...www.youtube.com