Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

It’s unknown whether people in the media are pretending to be extremely dumb or if they actually believe their crap. It may be true that half are mentally retarded and the other half are just paid actors pretending to be stupid.

And if you thought that no other place could possibly have lower standards than the US when it comes to journalism, you thought wrong. It turns out, that Australia may have some of the world's most mentally incompetent reporters to have walked this earth.

Australian Associated Press reporter Kat Wong tried to call out Tucker Carlson for being racist by lying about things he never said.

According to the Washington Examiner

Australian Associated Press reporter Kat Wong questioned Carlson about his immigration views and said that he has “talked” about the “Great Replacement Theory” on his show regarding how “white Australians, Americans, and Europeans” are being replaced by “nonwhite immigrants.”

“Whites are being replaced? I don’t think I said that,” Carlson pushed back.

“Well, it’s been mentioned on your show 4,000 times,” she said.

“Really? When did I say that whites are being replaced?” he responded.

Although she could not name any of those 4,000 times he allegedly said that, she assured him he definitely “said that before.”

“I’m pretty sure I haven’t said that. I said native-born Americans are being replaced, including blacks, native-born Americans,” the former Fox News host said. “Americans who, like black Americans, have been in the United States for many decades, their families over 400 years. Their concerns are every bit as real and valid and alive to me as the concerns of white people whose families have been there for 400 years. So I’ve never said that whites are being replaced, not one time. And you can’t cite it.”

He added, “We just met, but when our relationship starts with a lie, it makes it tough to be friends. You actually can’t cite it because I didn’t say it and I don’t believe it, and I’m telling you that to your face. So, why don’t you just accept me at face value?”

This woman is so delusional she still probably believes Tucker said that.

But the only way you can label Tucker as racist is by lying about things he never said.

This is also a common tactic the media uses, similar to what they do with Trump. They will take a minor snippet of something someone said while disregarding the major context, and pretend the speaker is talking about a certain race. Like when Trump said MS-13 gang members are animals the media pretended he was talking about Mexicans.

The fact that she truly believed Tucker said what he didn't say 4,000 times proves she does not do her research, even though that is her literal job. A higher-up told her to say that and she ran with it, without even questioning if it was factually correct. That is the modern state of journalism, where the only questions they ask are based on lies. These are the people pushing propaganda, not combating it.

And the worst part about all of this is that when Tucker proved her wrong, SHE DOUBLED DOWN. She didn’t listen to a word he said and then tried to pretend he condoned mass shootings. That is how absurd these people are.

So while Tucker tried to give her the benefit of the doubt by claiming she was only pretending to be stupid, he was proven wrong, as she made it clear she is objectively naive and painfully retarded.

It is not known if she went to bed that night thinking she owned one of the biggest voices in Conservative media, but it's probably safe to say she did.

DONALD v. THE WORLD: Trump’s 3 Keys to Debate Victory!www.youtube.com