At some point in history, we went from judging people based on character rather than skin color, to now apologizing for being white. Subsequently, racism is now a common practice when it comes to the workforce.

According to The Telegraph:

"Amanda Blanc, the chief executive of Aviva, has said all senior white male recruits must get final sign-off from her as part of a diversity drive to stamp out sexism in the financial services industry.

Ms Blanc, who became Aviva’s first female chief executive in 2020, told a parliamentary committee that there was 'no non-diverse hire at Aviva without it being signed off by me and the chief people officer.'"

But why not sign off on every race? Why does the policy have to be race-specific? And what about white women like herself? Will they have to be signed off before hiring?

"She said: 'Not because I don’t trust my team but [because] I want to make sure that the process followed for that recruitment has been diverse, has been properly done and is not just a phone call to a mate saying, ‘would you like a job, pop up and we’ll fix it up for you.'"

It is probably safe to say that she is not going to make sure that any of the "diverse" hires are not being offered a job from a "mate." Why is she implying that the reason white men land jobs is solely the result of relationships and not their abilities?

There is one word to describe all of this, and that word is "racism." But because the left needs to go and change definitions to justify their abhorrent behavior, this is now considered "anti-racism." But I think we all know that these are the most bigoted people among us as they believe the ONLY way a person who is not white can achieve is through some form of affirmative action. Her statements are reprehensible, at best.

Also, this white CEO was hired in 2020, the year racism and sexism became rampant in the hiring process. I would not doubt if the reason she got hired is because she is a woman, whatever that even is. But obviously, she won't walk her talk. She would never willingly give up her seat to a black woman.

Meritocracy is dead among the left, and it has been for quite some time. But the worst part about all of this is that the very people who claim to want diversity, reject any differing political ideologies and viewpoints. Since when do people have a "right" to be included? That is truly one of the dumbest concepts infecting our society.

People have no right to be included, especially when it comes to insignificant traits like sex or race. People should earn their inclusion and it is so dumb how people consider that controversial.

That said, can someone please find the objective benefit from all this DEI crap? Because I cannot seem to find that out.

Dim Democrats Are Upset The Taliban Is Not INCLUSIVE ENOUGH! | Louder With Crowderwww.youtube.com