Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

We are all living through the worst border crisis America has ever seen. Subsequently, the Biden Administration is sending $1 billion to the border. But it’s not to assist in the migrant crisis. It’s to combat climate change.

According to Fox News:

The Biden administration is funneling $1 billion in taxpayer funds to America's northern and southern borders to make dozens of federal ports of entry more climate friendly.

The General Services Administration (GSA) announced it would direct Inflation Reduction Act funds to support the climate initiatives at the border, even as the ongoing surge of migrants strains federal resources. While GSA Administrator Robin Carnahan and Andrew Mayock, President Biden's Federal Buy Clean Task Force co-chair, said the action would reduce "harmful emissions," the move was slammed by Republicans and experts.

"As usual, the Biden administration is refusing to address a problem of their own making," House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Bruce Westerman, R-Ark., told Fox News Digital. "Instead, they’re touting a billion-dollar investment in green technology at the border while Biden’s border crisis continues to wreak havoc on local communities and federal lands. Talk about fiddling while Rome burns."

"Time and time again, the House Committee on Natural Resources has spotlighted these issues and recently held a field hearing in one of the hardest-hit areas of southern Arizona, yet this administration refuses to address the crisis they’ve created," he continued.

According to the GSA, the funding will support reduced overall operational emissions of federal activities at the border, development of 23 all-electric buildings, projects ensuring four land ports of entry achieve net-zero emissions, and modernization and paving projects involving embodied carbon avoidance.

What is it about spending all this money that the White House believes will control the direction of the wind? Well, in one instance, $100 million is being used to make the San Luis land port in Arizona the first net-zero port of entry.

It is unclear what that entails or if it will increase or decrease the amount of rain in Arizona. But the government seems to believe that the more money they spend, the more control they have over the weather.

Meanwhile, in January, the federal government reported more than 156,000 migrant encounters at the U.S. southern border, a slight year-over-year uptick, but a decrease compared to the month prior. In December, more than 302,000 migrants were encountered crossing the border, by far the largest single-month figure ever recorded.

The December figures brought the fiscal 2024 first-quarter level to 785,000 encounters, the highest number ever recorded.

Rather than focus on doing anything to combat the “highest number” of encounters at the border in American history, the federal government would much rather focus on developing electric buildings.

I am glad to see this administration truly focusing on America's most dire issues.

The ironic thing is that Migrants trash the environment and on average leave behind nearly eight pounds of trash at the southern border. That may not seem like a lot but if you do math with how many migrants have been released into the country, you get detrimental effects on wildlife.

Question: Does anyone remember the Green New Deal passing? Because I don’t but it sure seems as if that’s what is happening.

Climate change is by no means a national security risk. But many would argue that the border crisis is. Ironically, an increase in illegal immigration negatively impacts the environment. So if the Left truly cared about climate change as they claim to do, they would at least pretend to care about the border crisis. But they cannot even be bothered with that, as electric buildings are the best we can get.

Debunking Climate Change Myths | Louder With Crowderwww.youtube.com