Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

A real woman has stated a biological fact and is getting sued for it. The fact was that only women menstruate. And because some lunatic believes this created “an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating and/or offensive environment” we now have this story for you.

According to The Daily Mail:

A lawyer linked to the Department for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) is being sued with her department after she made gender-critical statements at work, including expressing the belief that only women menstruate.

Elspeth Duemmer Wrigley, who works for 'an arms-length body to a government department' and chairs a civil service network representing staff with gender-critical views, will appear at an employment tribunal next week, accused of harassment over comments and posts shared at work.

Among the reasons given for the lawsuit, she says the claimant is suing her for a statement made during a seminar on 'Women and Autism' in which she said that 'only women menstruate'.

You would think that any judge would throw this suit out because it is so frivolous, but we are talking about the UK and someone got sent to prison last week for making stickers. So we should not be surprised if she is punished for stating “only women menstruate.”

According to Ms Duemmer Wrigley, the claimant - who has not been named - believes the existence of the network 'has the effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating and/or offensive environment for the claimant'.

In her crowdfunder, Ms Duemmer Wrigley said her department is being sued, among other reasons, for 'allowing our departmental SEEN network to exist.

She cites a number of reasons why she is personally being sued, including the seminar statement and a post listing the nine protected characteristics, not including gender expression, gender identity or gender following 'errors in staff training' that included them.

She also says she is being sued for sharing a link to a 'well known children's book', a link to an interview with 'detransitioner and fellow civil servant Ritchie Herron', and a link to a piece written by a lesbian colleague discussing her Jamaican heritage and experience of being a lesbian in the civil service.

And she notes a statement made on an internal work forum 'in which I explained why I was gender critical'.

It is not a good sign of the times that people are being threatened with legal action for stating biological facts. But that is Progressivism in a nutshell, where they go as far away from the truth as possible and replace it with ideological gobbledygook.

What is the point of threatening someone with legal action for stating something that is such a blatant fact, to the point that more people believe the earth is flat than the claim that men get periods? There is no point but to shut down truth because in the marketplace of ideas, such asinine claims could never hold up.

Let's hope we don't get a woke activist judge with this one. The only thing worse than a woke progressive who throws temper tantrums over anatomy is a judge waiting to help.

Not even a decade ago, a lawyer would likely get sanctioned for bringing such a frivolous complaint forward. But sadly, that is no longer the status quo.

Leaked Disney Footage: Baymax Shops for Tampons | Louder With Crowderwww.youtube.com