data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7016/b7016cf9e7836fe98bec5ecfcd01edb45e16dd8a" alt="NYT drops despicable anti-Elon Musk hit piece tying him to apartheid... but didn't they try this one already?"
×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
Elon MuskMarch 03, 2025
NYT drops despicable anti-Elon Musk hit piece tying him to apartheid... but didn't they try this one already?
The left and the media (but I repeat myself) are apocalyptic that Elon Musk has been appointed by Donald Trump to shrink the size of government, expose waste, and dismantle the bureaucracy that keeps the left in power even when they aren't in power. "He's unelected," cries journalismers as they light their Anthony Fauci prayer candles. And, like any time the media and the left (but I repeat myself) have a political disagreement, they accuse you of racism. Today that means the New York Times' pathetic attempt to die Cousin Elon to South African apartheid.
Mind you, this is the same NYT that's ok with apartheid when it targets white people. Or, if not "okay" with it, they are quick to make excuses.
Shame on the NY Times for publishing this opinion piece trying to smear @elonmusk.
Musk is "a white South African, part of a demographic that for centuries sat atop a racial hierarchy maintained by violent colonial rule. That history matters."
Musk has "not so much moved beyond… pic.twitter.com/ZFu5ZvKlBd
— Tom Bevan (@TomBevanRCP) March 3, 2025
I won't even bother linking to it because the New York Times literally attempted this three years ago. Remember when Cousin Elon bought Twitter, and both the left and the media (you know, the deal) were having conniptions because there was a sole social media platform on which they couldn't control the flow of information? NYT tried dropping this:
I'm not angry at the New York Times as much as I am impressed with their utter lack of self respect for themselves. pic.twitter.com/Bv6d4QgDSb
— Brodigan (@brodigan) May 5, 2022
Musk + Misinformation + White Privilege = the reporters know damn well people will read a tweet and a headline and skip the 1000-word essay. They've defended their work and the journalistic integrity of stealth editing a headline. To summarize the previous hit piece, the words "Elon" and "Musk" were used in the backdrop of apartheid, hoping the reader wouldn't realize there was no connection between the two. No, Musk's dad was "an anti-apartheid politician."
Mama Musk was less than amused. "In South Africa, if you publicly opposed apartheid, you went to jail. In Russia, if you publicly oppose the war, you go to jail. [NYT] are you going to blame children for decisions made by governments?"
Three years later, the New York Times is at it again. Why? Because the billionaires who dictate what the left thinks each week, realizing it's futile to oppose Donald Trump anymore, have chosen Elon Musk as the boogeyman who will allegedly dismantle democracy with his bare hands.
It didn't work three years ago. It's not going to work today,
><><><><><><Brodigan is Grand Poobah of this here website and when he isn't writing words about things enjoys day drinking, pro-wrestling, and country music. You can find him on the Twitter too.
Facebook doesn't want you reading this post or any others lately. Their algorithm hides our stories and shenanigans as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface? Sign up for our DAILY EMAIL BLASTS! They can't stop us from delivering our content straight to your inbox. Yet.
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
Latest