People with pronouns in their bio have proved to the world that they will affirm lies so long as it’s politically correct. This is even worse when it’s coming from the American media, which is why Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt ignores emails from reporters with pronouns in their signature because they do “not care about biological reality or truth and therefore cannot be trusted to write an honest story.”

According to Fox News:

New York Times reporter Michael Grynbaum said the press office has rejected emails on "three recent occasions" from reporters who display the gender-identifying label, and attributed quotes to press secretary Karoline Leavitt expressing it as policy.

"As a matter of policy, we do not respond to reporters with pronouns in their bios," Leavitt told a Times reporter with pronouns in their signature, who had inquired about a climate research observatory.

Logically speaking, this would be equivalent to responding to someone who identifies as a cat. And insanity should not be tolerated, especially when it comes to informing the American public of current events. Thus, anyone identifying in a way contradictory to biological facts should be treated like the buffoons they are.

"As a matter of policy, I don’t respond to people who use pronouns in their signatures as it shows they ignore scientific realities and therefore ignore facts," Miller told the reporter. In a separate message, she added, "This applies to all reporters who have pronouns in their signature."

If you “ignore scientific realities and therefore ignore facts,” then you have no place working in the media, as their self-identified identity goes against everything our founders intended the First Amendment to be.

Grynbaum also reached out to Leavitt for comment, inquiring whether this type of response was a press office policy. The press secretary replied via email, "Any reporter who chooses to put their preferred pronouns in their bio clearly does not care about biological reality or truth and therefore cannot be trusted to write an honest story."

I am having trouble seeing how this is controversial. No one would care if the White House said the same thing regarding not responding to adults who identify as animals, but the left will likely portray this as an assault on trans rights, so there's that. Nonetheless, truth is truth despite the ambiguous, indescribable feelings one feels deep down inside and once the pronoun warriors admit that the easier things will be for them. Until then, they will have to navigate working as a White House correspondent while their fake existence is against staff policy. And that is nothing more than a personal problem.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com