The latest feminist trend has been to replace what "beautiful" implies with something fatter or uglier. Preferably both. The goal is for men to upchuck their lunch, thus allowing them a thinner waistline. Or so one must believe with the latest "beauty" trends. Goodbye beer belly, hello self-inflicted blindness.

This lingerie company is the perfect example. Their new "inclusive" ad campaign features 8 models who all have one thing in common. Hint: it's not sex appeal.

A transgender woman has shunned the haters and championed diversity by starring in an inclusive lingerie campaign. [She] says she took part in the lingerie brand's boudoir photoshoot to help redefine the word 'sexy'. #TheNewSexy introduces eight powerful female role models, including an Alopecia sufferer, an amputee and a recovered anorexic... Head of PR and Marketing added, 'It's important for us as a brand to speak to as many women as possible through our campaigns. We know our customers don't all look the same so why should our models?'

First of all, no. What is with this new fangled fad to redefine words? Stop, don't answer, it's rhetorical. Rather than people trying to fit the word, they're changing the word to fit them. In this case they're also making us want to swallow knives.

Secondly, this campaign is laden with glaring hypocrisies. SJW causes usually are. As already touched upon, trying to "redefine sexy" while desperately employing tools of traditional beauty to make your models more appealing... that's hypocritical, no? Each of those moonfaced gorgons sat through hours of grooming and makeup before taking these photos. They posed in a specific manner, pouted their lips, and sucked in their tummies. As much as physics would allow.

Remind me again how they're doing anything differently than Victoria's Secret? You know, besides being less attractive? Woefully less attractive.

The worst part? Not the models, but the empty justification from the people who organized the shoot. If these organizers believed these girls were sexy, they wouldn't feel compelled to shout: "They're sexy. Just in a different way. Accept or you're a shameful, hateful, sexist BIGOT!" The organizers don't care about these broads. Instead of celebrating these gals for their personalities, abilities, or skills, they went with their most shallow attributes: good looks. Which isn't their strong suit. We call that "setting someone up to fail."

Also, let's talk about the penis in the room. How is throwing a dress on a dude going to connect with more women via their advertising? Someone please explain. Also tell me which one is the tranny. Me no can see it.

Ever notice how all the people trying to "redefine beauty" are unattractive in some way? Yeah, that's not a coincidence. It's got bitter written all over it. Feminists don't want to create a "new sexy," they want to hijack the old sexy (read Dear Ugly, Fat Feminists: Admit It, You HATE That Men Don't Find You Attractive). That's why they're still conforming to the same ole "traditional" beauty methods. And if you don't think they're sexy then you're the problem. Not them. Or their rolls. Or their penises.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.