If you gain 100 hundred pounds in several years but spend the last few months losing five, does that mean your weight is better than ever? That is exactly the logic the left keeps using when they try to gaslight Americans to vote against their best interest.

In a thriving economy, moms don’t have to choose between school supplies or paying bills. If people's finances were better than ever, you wouldn't have to keep telling voters that. Especially, because an empty wallet speaks otherwise.

So while families are suffering under one of the worst inflation crises in American history, the left keeps demanding you vote for the person responsible for this.

Fox contributor Mary Katharine Ham called out political analyst Juan Williams after he claimed your empty wallet means the opposite of what you thought.

According to The Daily Caller:

Goldman Sachs economists released a note last week suggesting that the economy under Vice President Kamala Harris could give a “very slight boost” to GDP investment, while Trump’s plan might negatively impact growth due to “tariffs and tighter immigration policy.” Williams defended Goldman Sachs’ response to the two administrations during “Sunday Report,” but Ham interjected, noting that they weren’t addressing the concerns of average Americans at the grocery store.

“The reality is, if you look at the numbers, the economy is better now than it was then. So you’re dealing with this kind of memory sense of things,” Williams said. “But the context is Goldman Sachs, they’re no left-wing organization. They’re saying the economy will be better under Kamala Harris — ” Williams said.

Kamala is the de facto president and the economy is not doing better than Trump. Additionally, it was her tie-breaking votes that contributed to this mess.

“They’re also not mom buying groceries though,” Ham jumped in.

No matter what out-of-touch millionaires claim, the average American is struggling to make ends meet. These are something that Kamala donors cannot physically comprehend if their lives depended on it.

According to CNN, “35% of adults say they’ve recently had to take on extra work to make ends meet.” Why would anyone vote for the status quo when that was not the case under the former administration?

According to the USDA, “In 2022, food prices increased by 9.9 percent, faster than in any year since 1979. Food-at-home prices increased by 11.4 percent, while food-away-from-home prices increased by 7.7 percent.”

Does that sound like an administration that will promote policies that will lower the cost of groceries? Because if she is capable of doing that why isn't Kamala doing that?

“I think this week there was 88 top executive who came out and said, ‘We think the economy will spur, will boost under Kamala Harris,'” Williams continued. “And this week Trump went before the New York economic club to give a speech and it should have been — given the perception he want to say the economy was better — it should’ve been a knockout for him in front of all those rich men. Instead, he delivered word salad on a question about child care.”

The Dems are undoubtedly the party of millionaires and billionaires, as they do everything in their power to destroy the middle class. So while you are struggling to make ends meet, Goldman Sachs could care less, which is why you should vote against their best interest and in favor of yours.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com