Clarence Thomas grew up in the segregationist south. Hillary Clinton grew up a privileged white woman. Only a privileged white woman would label someone like Clarence Thomas, a black man, as full of resentment, grievance, or anger. Is this 2022? Or are we back in the 60s when Hillary Clinton's political party thought the segregation Clarence Thomas lived through was the cat's pajamas?

Please imagine Donald Trump referring to Kamala Harris as someone who has always been a person of grievance, resentment, and anger.

Does this look like an angry man to you?

Liberal white women seem to be the ones least able to calm down about Roe v. Wade being overturned. And they have settled on Clarence Thomas, the one black man on the bench, as the villain.

So much so, that they feel comfortable writing the n-word on signs to signal their disapproval of him. Hard R, too.

Hillary didn't go this far. But she is using her white liberal privilege to attack a person of color in a way that would never be accepted if political parties were reversed.

Though, to be fair somewhat to Hillary, she may not "mean" to be racist and is only lashing out because she knows, deep down, this is all her fault. Hers and Ruth Bader Ginsberg's. Had Hillary the skill and ability to defeat Donald Trump, Trump wouldn't have been the one to appoint justices to the Supreme Court. Deep down, Hillary knows this is her failure. She's just taking it out on the black man.

The Louder with Crowder Dot Com Website is on Instagram now!Follow us at @lwcnewswire and tell a friend!

Weirdo Hillary Clinton: Masterclass in FAKE CRYING | Louder With Crowderyoutu.be