So, there is ANOTHER career ending Hillary Clinton scandal in the news. Two inspector generals have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal inquiry into Hillary Clinton's emails. Read the full story in the New York Times.

Wait, did I say "career ending"? What I meant to say was "should be career ending but will probably never be covered because the media wants to attend Clinton's cocktail parties."

What's interesting is that this story is apparently so bad, that Hillary Clinton's people called the New York Times and told them to change it.

Which they of course did. Well, one does.

The paper initially reported that two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation "into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state."

That clause, which cast Clinton as the target of the potential criminal probe, was later changed: the inspectors general now were asking for an inquiry "into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state."

Yes, the same New York Times that stands by their Marco Rubio has a luxury boat story, changed this because Hillary yelled at them.

Because journalism.