×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
ArticlesFebruary 21, 2024
Blue State Wants To Label Parents As Child Abusers If They Refuse To Medically Affirm Child Or Provide Abortion
Who would have thought that we would be living in a time where not killing your grandchild or not sterilizing your children would get you labeled as a child abuser? But you better believe it becomes that may soon be the status quo in Illinois.
But I guess we should not be surprised because this is what happens when policymakers have progressive priorities.
Democrats in Illinois are responsible for proposed legislation that would classify parents as child abusers if they refuse to “affirm” their child's gender-transition or let them get an abortion.
Illinois Democrats are pushing legislation that would classify a parent's refusal to provide their child with gender-transition care or abortion access as child abuse.
Introduced by Democratic state Rep. Anne Stava-Murray to the Illinois General Assembly, HB 4876 would amend the existing Abused and Neglected Child Reporting Act to define an "abused child" as any child who is denied "access to necessary medical care, including, but not limited to, primary care services, abortion services, or gender-affirming services," according to the legislation.
Under the legislation, "consent to the performance of abortion services and gender-affirming services executed by a minor is not voidable because of such a minority."
Medical providers who would treat these Illinois children without parental consent would appear to face no legal repercussions under HB 4876.
The bill "provides that a health care professional rendering abortion services and gender-affirming services shall not incur civil or criminal liability for failure to obtain valid consent or professional discipline for failure to obtain valid consent if the health care professional relied in good faith on representations made by the minor."
What if that minor gets the abortion against her parent's wishes and regrets it later in life? Will policymakers be labeled as abusers for encouraging someone about her “choice” when the parents knew best all along?
What about if someone medically transitions against the will of the parents and then suffers great medical harm because of it? Would policymakers be labeled as abusers because of that?
I think we all know the answers to that.
The most insane part about all of that is that state officials are acting as if they can make one universal blanket policy regarding life-changing medical procedures for people they have never even met, who are not even of the age to consent. That is beyond insane, that is evil.
How do Democrats know that chopping off a healthy party is in the best interest of a child they don't know? They don’t and this is beyond deranged.
But this is what happens when yournaive and degenerate ideology dictates your priorities. And unfortunately, the very group we are tasked with protecting in society falls victim to all that.
Wait, Did Boston Just Legalize Slavery?!www.youtube.com
Latest