This Kavanaugh debacle just keeps getting more and more loopy. Just the other day, one of Kavanaugh's accusers pulled a take-backsie on his story. Now, another accuser is telling a different tale.

Julie Swetnick, Creepy porn lawyer's Kavanaugh accuser, is now saying she can't say for sure if Kavanaugh non-consensually got his jollies with lady-folk.

The third woman who accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct stated during an interview with NBC’s Kate Snow that she could not definitively say that Kavanaugh was one of the teenage boys who assaulted her.

“I cannot specifically say that he was one of the ones who assaulted me. But before this happened to me, at that party, I saw Brett Kavanaugh there. I saw Mark Judge there,” she continued. “And they were hanging about the area where I started to feel disoriented and where the room was, and where the other boys were hanging out. And laughing. I could hear them laughing and laughing.”

In the interview, she also named four people who allegedly went to these “gang rape” parties with her — but none of them were able to corroborate her story.

Uh, "I can't say for sure" is a whole lot different than "Brett Kavanaugh is a raper."

Just the other day, she was certain Brett was spiking punch and committing rapery in a conga line with his bros. Now, she's not so sure. If that's the case, why come forward at all? Unless, of course, it's just a tale she made up for attention. I mean, it wouldn't be a first.

Had we "believed all women" in this case, Kavanaugh would be nailed to a cross right now on account of having maybe sorta having something to do with an alleged rape. This is why due process matters. "Believing all women," without digging deeper and verifying their stories, sometimes ends up condemning innocent folk.

While we're on the subject:

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.