With all the focus on COVID-19 and Shutdowngatepaloozaghazi, it's been easy to forget there are other stories across America, like young female athletes having opportunities stolen from them by male athletes who are giant walking pussies pretend to be female athletes. Two girls in Connecticut are in the process of suing those douche heads (see FINALLY! GIRLS SUE TO BLOCK TRANSGENDER 'WOMEN' FROM COMPETING IN GIRLS' SPORTS and SOUTH PARK TACKLES TRANSGENDERS COMPETING IN WOMEN'S SPORTS [VIDEO]).

While the case is ongoing, their lawyer has been ordered by the presiding judge to stop referring to male athletes as male athletes. So that's not great news.

But first, a video.

Boys competing in girls' sports? It's time to stand for fair playyoutu.be

Attorneys representing three female high school track athletes in their effort to bar biological males from competing against them filed a motion on Saturday calling for the presiding judge to recuse himself after he forbid the attorneys from referring to the transgender athletes at issue as “males."

During an April 16 conference call, District Judge Robert Chatigny chastised the ADF attorneys for referring to the male athletes seeking to compete in the women's division as “males," according to a transcript of the call obtained by National Review.

Chatigny: "What I'm saying is you must refer to them as “transgender females" rather than as “males." Again, that's the more accurate terminology, and I think that it fully protects your client's legitimate interests. Referring to these individuals as “transgender females" is consistent with science, common practice and perhaps human decency. To refer to them as “males," period, is not accurate, certainly not as accurate, and I think it's needlessly provocative. I don't think that you surrender any legitimate interest or position if you refer to them as transgender females. That is what the case is about. This isn't a case involving males who have decided that they want to run in girls' events. This is a case about girls who say that transgender girls should not be allowed to run in girls' events. So going forward, we will not refer to the proposed intervenors as “males"; understood?"

Looks like the judge is anti-science. Or the judge is just anti-woman. The rules are increasingly cockamamie. Which is slang for "insane," not a reference to male genitalia. Bottom line, transgenders remain ranked #1 as the left's most marginalized. The Chinese have been climbing the charts, but trans still take the the crown. While women continue to slide out of the top ten. Just ask Tara Reade.

I wonder if the judge in question has a daughter and how he would handle it if his daughter was robbed of opportunities in the name of wokeness. "Sorry, honey, but you're not marginalized enough for me to care. There are rules to this game. Next time, have a penis."

Seems like some male privilege is afoot.

As always, if you're feeling lippy and want to have a good chuckle over men beating women in sports because LOL, go slam a car door on your schlong. Young women are having their hard work erased by weak men and those who value men (even weak ones) over women. If you think we're over sexism, think again.

Transgender females are not female, they're male. Hence "transgender" being added to the front. Remember, "transgender" is just a long form of "not." A transgender female is a not-female. As in a male. Preferences in language do not supersede science. Preferences in semantics should not supersede rights.

WHEN TRANSGENDERS ATTACK! 'Change My Mind' Edition | Louder with Crowderyoutu.be

Not subscribed to the podcast?Fix that! It's completely free.