The left is often scared of inanimate objects and things related to truth. This is why a 12-year-old boy was sent home after the administration claimed he made people feel “unsafe” for wearing a factually correct shirt. Their defense for censoring a student was that this promoted hate speech even though hate speech is not a thing and I am having trouble finding the part in the constitution where the school should regulate feelings. Nonetheless, the side of sanity will continue with its fight to keep things sane.

The student, Liam Morrison, sued the school because of this blatant infringement of his rights.

Keep 12-Year-Old Liam from Speaking? Not a Chance.www.youtube.com

According to The Washington Times:

A federal appeals court has ruled against a Massachusetts eighth-grader whose school forbade him from wearing a T-shirt with the message “There Are Only Two Genders” — a decision he is likely to further appeal.

A panel of the First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals deferred to the Middleborough Public Schools in its 3-0 ruling, saying that “we see no reason to substitute our judgment for Middleborough’s with respect to its application of its Dress Code here,” specifically its prohibition on “hate speech” clothing.

“Insofar as the Shirt does demean the gender identities of students who are transgender or gender nonconforming, we agree with Middleborough it is no less likely to ’strike a person at the core of his being’ than it would if it demeaned the religion, race, sex, or sexual orientation of other students,” Chief Judge David J. Barron, an Obama appointee, said in the 70-page opinion released Sunday.

Question: What if he wore a shirt that said there are more than two genders? Would he have also been sent home? Obviously, not.

He wore a factually correct shirt, you can't just say some students don't believe in facts and that makes his shirt demeaning. And the term demeaning is also subjective and gender is not.

The Alliance Defending Freedom said it will likely appeal the ruling on behalf of student Liam Morrison, arguing that the First Circuit “erred in its decision denying L.M. his right to free speech.”

“This case isn’t about T-shirts; it’s about a public school telling a middle-schooler that he isn’t allowed to express a view that differs from their own,” ADF senior counsel David Cortman said. “The school actively promotes its view about gender through posters and ’Pride’ events, and it encourages students to wear clothing with messages on the same topic — so long as that clothing expresses the school’s preferred views on the subject.”

He said that “the government cannot silence any speaker just because it disapproves of what they say.”

Does the school care if other students feel unsafe because of all the pride propaganda? What if their feelings are hurt? Are they going to stay consistent with their infringement on speech? Obviously, not.

Remember when sticks and stones used to be a thing? We are now at the point of affirming feelings as if they need affirming. Sometimes feelings are valid and sometimes they are not. The school should teach that.

The school wants to solely promote views they agree with and that is the real issue at hand. And it's insane that officials in charge of education are doubling down on the lie that there are more than two genders.

The point is, that gender is not a subjective feeling, and facts are protected speech, no matter what an Obama-appointed judge rules. And it's really great that this kid is standing up for his fellow students everywhere.

He may have lost this battle but hopefully, he will win the war.

80 NEW PAGES?! Michael Patrick Leahy Gives Details Into Covenant School Shooter's Pastwww.youtube.com