Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

One of the common themes among progressives is their incredible ability to project nearly everything wrong with them. Not only are they incapable of holding themselves accountable, but they do the exact opposite and point the finger at the destruction they cause. In this specific instance, “Morning Joe” accused the mainstream media of engaging in “moral relativism” and trying too hard to remain “objective” in the way they cover Trump.

According to The Daily Caller:

A panel on “Morning Joe” accused the media on Wednesday of handing over an unfair advantage to Republican nominee Donald Trump in their coverage in an attempt to appear unbiased toward Democrats.

The panel argued that the media has failed to hold Trump accountable for his alleged dangerous rhetoric in an attempt to appear unbiased and objective towards both of the presidential nominees ahead of the 2024 election. The show’s co-host, Mike Barnicle, alleged that the media ignores Trump’s rhetoric and always adds criticism of Vice President Kamala Harris when they negatively cover the former president.

Firstly, this is factually incorrect. All the evidence proves that the media is undoubtedly favorable towards Kamala. The Media Research Center (MRC), found that 84 percent of Kamala’s coverage was positive, while Trump had 89 percent negative coverage.

The fact that the media tries so hard to report on Kamala favorably and the election is still this close tells you all you need to know. It’s people like the ones on this panel that voters are fed up with, as they are nothing but government propagandists for the powers that be.

“There’s a false equivalency going on in the coverage of this race in that Donald Trump can say whatever crazy things he wants to say, about submarines and sharks and electric batteries, whatever he wants to say, and it’s not really covered in the sense that it’s covered describing who said it, why he said it and who the man is — Trump,” Barnicle said.

What is he even talking about? No one cares about what Trump did or did not say about Sharks and the fact that this is what the media is wasting time on is pathetic.

“Out of his mind. And always in that story in the false equivalency by too many reporters and too many American newspapers is also: ‘By the way, Kamala Harris changed her mind on fracking.’ They always throw in something like that in coverage of the story. It is ridiculous. We don’t cover the man for how dangerous he is.”

Wow. Are they saying that swing voters don’t have a right to know whether or not their jobs are at stake this election? At a time when people are struggling to make ends meet, these out-of-touch “journalists” have some nerve taking issue with real-life problems.

Whether or not Kamala bans fracking makes no difference to these people, as they have more money than most people can even imagine. It’s infuriating because something that does not affect them can still be newsworthy.

Sixty percent of parents could not afford school supplies this year. No one on this panel even mentioned that, as they demand none of that is covered at the expense of you barely living paycheck to paycheck. They insist the media not report on it because it might help Trump win, as they announced to the world they could care less about economic calamity because that’s for the little people to worry about.

Co-host Joe Scarborough said the media is engaging in “moral relativism” by allegedly failing in its duty to cover Trump in an attempt to remain unbiased.

The nerve of these people to mention moral relativism when they couldn't keep their standards straight if their life depended on it.

“For some reason, the mainstream media, nine years into Donald Trump’s era in American politics, still doesn’t know how to cover Donald Trump,” Scarborough said. “They still are engaging even at this late hour in moral relativism and saying, ‘Yeah, but, yeah, but.’ And, again, they just don’t know how to put it in proper perspective because, as I said yesterday, they are so concerned about being objective that they’re treating this race like it was 1996 … Their ‘objective’, and I put that word in quotes, their ‘objectivity’ actually is not objectivity at all. It ends up playing to Donald Trump’s advantage every day because they are so numbed by the hate, the hate speech, that has spewed out of his mouth for the past nine years.”

So who is saying “Yeah, but, yeah, but?” And why is this on TV? How can people listen to this crap and be convinced it’s “journalism?” Additionally, it’s unclear if these people will discuss anything significant rather than spending most of their time insulting Trump, but they won’t be “objective.”

Do they not realize that “hate speech” has nothing to do with the real issues? Claiming the media is “numbed by hate” just means they are crying because they don’t report on Kamala's fake joy as much as they demand.

According to MSNBC, the media's positive reporting on Kamala 90 percent of the time is “objective” and not good enough. That is how unhinged these people are and it’s shocking they don’t even try to hide it.

Maybe one day the media will report on something crucial to the American people but as of now, they couldn't be more pathetic.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com