In 2012, leftists clung to statistician Nate Silver to tell them everything was going to be all right. And to be fair, the dude has a knack for predicting elections. He knows his stuff. So when Silver descended upon the left with promising numbers in 2012, he was hailed as the precious bearer of good news. But since this clip aired, it won't be long before those same leftists are running to their safe spaces yelling "RIGGED!"

"Clinton is a lot weaker in the Midwest, where four years ago President Obama was leading in Ohio by four points."

“Look, you have some forecasts that show Clinton with a 98 or 99 percent chance of winning. That doesn’t pass a commonsense test."

Hillary could be in trouble if they don’t [turn out big numbers] because, “there is a big white working-class vote for Trump.”

Of course, a quick google search of Nate Silver shows leftist outlets already rushing to accuse him of wrongness. Surprise! They only like numbers when they serve their agenda (see CAUGHT: MSNBC Manipulates Polls to Show Trump 'Losing Ground'...). They don't want to hear about numbers when they're mean and accurate. Monster.

This election is turning out to be closer than many would have guessed (see Even MSNBC: This Doesn't Feel Like a Winning Campaign for Hillary Clinton and Bad News Hillary! MASSIVE Majority Believes Clinton Acted Illegally...). It seems that the tables are ever so slightly beginning to turn on ole Hill, even despite all her string yanking and spirit cooking. The part where her corruptedness came under investigation certainly didn't help.

More "fair" predictions like this are tossed to the wayside with the unwanted babies. Leftists cling to the polls that favor their candidate. At this point, there's enough speculation to drown in. There's one thing we know for sure though - it's all over tomorrow night. Finally.

We hope...

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.