Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

For all of human history, biological sex was a thing, which is why it’s used as the deciding factor for sports. And although nothing in life is fair, even cavemen knew this was the justified way to go about things. However, one day progressives woke up and demanded an end to girls’ sports based on the premise that someone can feel some type of way despite biological reality.

Given the fact that ambiguous feelings don’t actually dictate anatomy, most people are not gaslighted into “affirming” their way in the pursuit of ending girls’ sports. So while the left pretends abortion is the most important social issue for females right now, they are actively working to end the rights of females everywhere. However, given how asinine this is, many people won’t stand up for this injustice.

The University of Nevada Girls Volleyball team voted to forfeit against San Jose State to protest their trans players, making them the fifth team to do so. However, given that the school is run by a bunch of misogynistic leftists, officials have declared their votes null and void and demanded they play against a man, despite safety concerns.

According to the New York Post:

Monday, players on Nevada’s women’s volleyball team issued a statement to OutKick announcing their decision to forfeit their Oct. 26 match, overriding a previous decision from their university.

“We, the University of Nevada Reno women’s volleyball team, forfeit against San Jose State University and stand united in solidarity with the volleyball teams of Southern Utah University, Boise State University, the University of Wyoming, and Utah State University,” the statement said, referring to the other teams who have forfeited their matches.

“We demand that our right to safety and fair competition on the court be upheld. We refuse to participate in any match that advances injustice against female athletes.”

In a lengthy statement in response, the University of Nevada told the outlet that the players’ decision “does not represent” the stance of the school and that it “intends” to proceed with the match.

How will the school “proceed with the match” if the players stand up for their rights? And since when did school officials have the authority to dictate what's permissible civil disobedience?

“The players’ decision and statement were made independently, and without consultation with the University or the athletic department. The players’ decision also does not represent the position of the University,” the school’s statement said.

“The University and its athletic programs are governed by the Nevada Constitution and Nevada law, which strictly protect equality of rights under the law, and that equality of rights shall not be denied or abridged by this state or any of its subdivisions on account of race, color, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, age, disability, ancestry or national origin.

So when the school states they believe in "equality of rights under the law" they really mean only half of the population, as they cannot have women's rights and trans rights, as one overrides the other.

This is also why trans rights are not real, as you cannot claim someone is more important based on ideological feelings that no one can logically describe. And just because some man may or may not feel some type of way that should not give that man the right to do as he pleases.

This is one of the most pressing social issues of the times and one day history will remember that the University of Nevada stood on the side of misogyny rather than women’s rights.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com