Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
HYPOCRISY: 'Feminist' New York Times Journalist Says "Melania Trump is a Hooker..."
We all know how much the left hates "SLUT SHAMING!" But only when it comes to pit-braided sea cows like Amy Schumer. If your last name is Trump, on the other hand? Totes okay. In fact Melania has been the unfortunate target of loads of leftist rage, for obvious reasons of course. Like having the last name Trump (see Angry Liberal Chases, Screams and Harasses Ivanka Trump on Flight and Actress Abigail Breslin Posts Photo With Tiffany Trump...Leftists Attack!). Or being not fat.
The latest example is a nameless New York Times reporter. In trying to mack it with actress Emily Ratajkowski last night, he/she/ze made a few disparaging comments about Melania.
Ratajkowski wasn't amused...
Out of all the vagina-hatted feminists who marched on Washington, we've only seen outrage over the media's "sexist" attacks on Melania from... one. Kudos to her for the intellectual honesty, but sorry about the whole not having a dad thing. You know, because feminist.
Meanwhile most leftists, like reporters from the New York Times, consider confident blinking in the direction of ladyfolk to be sexist. Except when said lady is someone they disagree with. In which case, slut shame away!
Though to be fair to the New York Times, after they were called out on their crap, they have released a statement saying they know who the reporter was and gave him/her/ze a stern talking to...
At a party last night, a Times reporter who does not cover Washington or politics, referred to an unfounded rumor regarding Melania Trump, a Times spokesperson said in a statement to POLITICO. The comment was not intended to be public, but it was nonetheless completely inappropriate and should not have occurred. Editors have talked to the reporter in question about the lapse.
Oh, I see. It wasn't a political reporter. That changes everything.
And yes, the "if this was a conservative reporter talking about Chelsea Clinton" statement is implied. Because if this were Chelsea Clinton, or The Hag Herself Clinton? There would be feminist hell to pay. A true nightmare. Then again, anything involving feminists seems to be rather nightmarish...
