Update September 25, 2017: It's come to our attention the DailyMail, from which our original post was sourced, was required to print a lengthy correction due to a complaint which was upheld by the "Independent Press Standards Organisation." Yes, with an "s" because the United Kingdom does what it does. You can read the full correction the IPSO  (like "ipso facto," how quaint) required the DailyMail include in their original article here.

Also, a reminder: Louder with Crowder writes news commentary. We are more "opinion journalism" less "Companies who claim the mantle of real news when reporting on p!ssing Russian prostitutes, but actually push listicles full of cat gifs." Hence pull quotes from news sources followed by commentary. We do not pretend to be a news organization (with a "z" because in America, even letters at the end of the alphabet get repped. We pronounce it "zee" not "zed" excuse me as I throw tea in a lake), and thought that rather clear with the show at large. Which, I doubt, aforementioned companies who fancy themselves news (but are hacks at best), have ever seen. Allegedly.

Below is our unedited original article from February.

In recent years, we've learned quite a bit about all things climate change. Mostly regarding how much leftists fib about it. Speaking of which, the latest in climate change lies comes from NOAA. No surprise there. Apparently the organization attempted to rally major support in the fight against global warming/cooling/climate change in 2015. And succeeded. The only problem? Turns out they're liar liars, pants on fires. Courtesy of DailyMail...

The organisation that is the world's leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

America's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

In case you aren't familiar, the Paris UN climate conference was a big deal. It's where the United Nations proposed an agreement wherein the ENTIRE WORLD would be forced into "fighting global warming." Obama was clearly affected by the alarming data. Which turned out to be lies, mind you. Of course, that didn't stop the Gaia-loving dumpcake from launching us into the agreement...

The report claimed that the 'pause' in global warming in the period since 1998 - revealed by UN scientists in 2013 - never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world's media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown evidence that the paper was based on misleading, 'unverified' data. It was never subjected to NOAA's rigorous internal evaluation process - which Dr Bates devised.

Let's pause for a moment here. Remember when a gaggle of actual scientists tried to warn the world of NOAA's fact-hating ways (read 300 Scientists Blast NOAA for Fudging 'Climate Change' Data...)? Yeah, those real scientists were super duper right. Score 1 for real scientists.

If ever you needed proof that climate "scientists" will do anything to push their agenda, this is it. Lie about numbers, conceal data, even screw the American people (see Clinton Tells Unemployed Coal Miners to Blame Job Loss on... Climate Change?!). All in a day's work for social justice colostomy bags. But hey, look on the bright side. At least global warming isn't a thing...

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.