×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
Woke CultureDecember 11, 2024
BLM Leader Claims Jury Was Racist In Daniel Penny Trial... Because Of "Unconventional Hair?"
BLM leader Chivona Newsome has decided that the jury was racist in the Daniel Penny trial and that if someone has “unconventional hair” that means they better be part of the decision-making or else that makes everyone racist.
I know none of that made sense but that is because these are not logical people interested in truth, as they have a racist worldview despite the reality of things.
Newsome went on News Nation to give her degenerate and reprehensible views on the case and none of it made sense. However, she did an incredible job proving how racist and delusional she is.
NEW: BLM leader says black female jurors were "shut out" from the Daniel Penny trial because of their "unconventional hair."
Lmao.
Chivona Newsome says black women were told they couldn't be jurors because of their hair.
The lunatic got shredded by NewsNation's Dan… pic.twitter.com/5wzAi0BHg7
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) December 11, 2024
LOL. Okay. She just haaaaad to throw in Kyle Rittenhouse because that is totallyyyyyyyyy relevant in this case.
The first question for this race baiter: Had the individual with hair that was deemed unconventional sat on the jury, would the verdict have changed? If not, is this whole thing still racist? And if so, how does she know?
Secondly, how does she know what Penny was thinking? Did she ask him? Because all the evidence proves the exact opposite of what she claims. And even if one of the witnesses was “scared,” there is still no proof to suggest any of this was about skin color.
Thirdly, what if Neely killed a Black woman? Would she have been more satisfied with the outcome? Because arguably, he saved several lives that day and it’s deranged she believes anything but. However, this proves how naive she truly is, as her mind refuses to comprehend the literal facts of the situation.
Additionally, how on earth does a muffin change the fact that Neely was a psycho who intended to hurt people that day? And it’s not like he does not have a record of randomly assaulting vulnerable people, and I doubt breakfast pastries would change that.
Rather than prove the jury saw this in a racial worldview, she showed how racist she truly is. And the fact that she won’t shut up after being proven to be so wrong shows how unhinged she truly is.
Latest
Don't Miss