According to PolitiFact, “They’re eating the pets” was dubbed the worst lie of the year, as it was allegedly “consequential.” However, it turns out it was not “consequential” enough to cost him the election.

LOL!

Is a lie still a lie if one believes the statement to be true? If the intent is to inform, rather than deceive, regardless if it is factual or not, is that still a lie? That is pretty clear, however, it is also clear that there is evidence to suggest someone or a group of people may or may not be “eating the pets.”

Is this a lie?

Are all the people in this 30-minute video also lying?

How about this video? Is the woman in it telling "consequential" lies?

Whether or not one believes the migrants in Springfield are eating the pets is not up to me to decide. However, the real problem is the media and our government officials disregarding the struggles of residents, while they were turned into second-class citizens in their hometown.

No one cares that a small town, already struggling, was forced to take on the world's problems at its own expense, regardless of its wishes. And the fact that the media bashed them as if they were nothing more than conspiracy theorists proves that they are the enemy of the American people, as they could not care less about reporting the truth.

Now, can someone write an article on the most "consequential" lie from PolitiFact?