×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
AbortionMarch 04, 2024
Pro-Choice doctor declares life-like fetal development video the "last thing kids need to be watching"
You would think that facts and reality are something you would want to present to people when trying to “educate” them, but that is not entirely true when facts and reality are not on your side of the argument. The only reason you would hide the truth is when you are not on the side of the truth. Which is why a pro-abortion OBGYN criticized a very life-like fetal development video for sex education classes and said it was the “last thing kids need to be watching.”
A Never Before Seen Look At Human Life In The Womb | Baby Oliviawww.youtube.com
Pro-choice OBGYNs blasted a fetal development video being considered for sex education curriculum in some states, with one doctor arguing the film was the "last thing kids need[ed] to be watching."
The animated video, created by pro-life nonprofit Live Action, follows the development of "Baby Olivia" from fertilization up to birth. Kentucky, Iowa, Missouri and West Virginia are considering legislation that would require students to watch the Baby Olivia video or similar fetal development videos in sex-ed classes. The efforts mirror a similar law passed in North Dakota last year.
However, the video created an uproar among some pro-choice medical groups. OBGYNs in favor of abortion told Fox News Digital the video was medically inaccurate and misleading.
"This video is misleading - and I am sure intentionally so - in that it shows development in weeks after fertilization, rather than weeks from last menstrual period which is how healthcare providers date pregnancy," Dr. Jennifer Lincoln, a board-certified OBGYN, said.
"Confusing people as to how far along they are so they can't or don't pursue an abortion is anti-abortion crisis pregnancy center tactics 101 - and we see it now being used in an allegedly educational video. While at the very end of the video they mention this dating discrepancy, they know children likely won't see this or grasp the difference in meaning as it relates to pregnancy dating, development, and potential abortion access; this is no accident," she argued.
"There are multiple other errors as well: calling electrical impulses a heartbeat, confusing sex with gender, calling a pregnancy a pregnancy prior to implantation, naming spontaneous movements as ‘playing’ etc.," she added.
"A video from an organization whose entire goal is to prevent abortion, fertility treatments, birth control usage, and bodily autonomy is the last thing kids need to be watching," she responded. "I'm all for teaching young people fetal development and sex education, but it must be medically accurate and from a source that is an actual expert. Live Action is neither of these."
The OBGYN encouraged states to develop "scientifically accurate" sex education resources "without a hidden agenda."
"Our students deserve that," she continued.
It is quite comical how she claims that students deserve scientifically accurate information, but in the same breath claims that the video was wrong because it confused “sex with gender.”
She also tries to dance around the reality of the developmental stages of the unborn child by throwing in random points that are irrelevant and don’t mean anything. The video is intended to show the gestation process, it is by no means considered pre-med training to predict the date of birth. And anyone who has taken a basic biology class can tell you that cells begin dividing hours after fertilization.
But the real issue at hand is that she is a doctor whose entire goal is based on ending life and not saving a life. That alone shows how deranged her properties are.
The only reason someone would not want to show that video is because these people are anything but pro-choice. They don't want women to choose life, they want them to choose abortion.
That said, she is not mad that the video has an "agenda," she is mad it does not have the agenda that she approves of.
Crowder Eviscerates The Stupidity of "White Rage!"www.youtube.com
Latest
Don't Miss