The Supreme Court, however, struck down that clause Monday, ruling that the law’s prohibition on providing federal trademarks for disparaging terms or logos violated the First Amendment’s free speech protections.

The ruling is another major setback for Native Americans who have fought to change the team’s name for nearly 50 years.

Interesting. So HuffPo thinks themselves the warriors for the American Indian/Indigenous Peoples. Advocating that American Indians/Indigenous Peoples should be offended over the "Redskins" controversy which isn't an actual controversy.

Excellent point here. The same right that allows someone to find offense at names, is the same right that allows for that name. In the industry, we call this a "two way street." Better left uncrossed by chickens or social justice jihadists. The difference is a subtle one.

To celebrate, bob-O, the Twitter Navajo, will be offering free haircuts. Caution: minor scalping may occur. It's a joke because not all American Indians are as stiff as HuffPost liberal stick in the mugs.

Twitter user bob-O has a point. The same people who're hot and bothered about "Redskins" are the same people who laud Elizabeth Warren, best known for her dabbling in Native American ancestry for her own gain. In the industry, we call this "irony." Also "being a selfish be-yotch."

So the score stands: 1 point free speech. Zero points to liberal douchenozzles.

For looksies into original Native American practices...

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.