Front hole. It's front hole. Why stick to anatomically correct language when one can cater to the feelings of people who demand their feelings be catered to at all times lest they scream hate speech, discrimination, then threaten to off themselves because you refused to cater your speech to their needs?

Run-on sentence. Not sorry. Here's the low down on what's down below:

Many individuals don’t see body parts as having a gender — people have a gender.

And as a result, the notion that a penis is exclusively a male body part and a vulva is exclusively a female body part is inaccurate. By using the word “parts” to talk about genitals and using medical terms for anatomy without attaching a gender to it, we become much more able to effectively discuss safe sex in a way that’s clear and inclusive.

A penis is exclusively a male body part. A vulva is exclusively a female body part. One cannot simply declare something as "inaccurate" to magically make it inaccurate.

Further, discussing "safe sex" should never be about inclusivity. The discussion of sex should be about the realities of sex: the purpose of it, what happens when people engage in it, the many possible outcomes of coitus, and if there are good jokes to derive from the experience. Extra points if you can throw in your mom.

For the purposes of this guide, we’ll refer to the vagina as the “front hole” instead of solely using the medical term “vagina.” This is gender-inclusive language that’s considerate of the fact that some trans people don’t identify with the labels the medical community attaches to their genitals.

For the purpose of this post, we'll refer to people who refer to "front holes" in place of vaginas as "delusional morons" hoping to twist the fabric of reality to conform to their erroneous fantasies all so they can congratulate each other for having more feelings at this week's wine tasting.

For example, some trans and nonbinary-identified people assigned female at birth may enjoy being the receptor of penetrative sex, but experience gender dysphoria when that part of their body is referred to using a word that society and professional communities often associate with femaleness. An alternative that’s becoming increasingly popular in trans and queer communities is front hole.

Translated: women enjoy P in the V sex with men. But want to be considered not women and their sexual partners not men, so let's all just rename the vajayjay to accommodate the people who want to continue fantasizing about being that which they're not outside of the bedroom.

Look, call your vagina whatever you want to call it. No one cares. It can be "queen of the damned" or the "Goblet of Fire" as Michelle Wolf once joked. What adults decide to call their own nether regions is for those people to decide. But encouraging others to rename something because the anatomical label is in anyway triggering? I'm drawing a line. "Line" here is not to be confused with dots, a shape, or that doodle on your napkin you made while on the phone with your accountant. Which may or may not be a doodle of double front bags (boobs). Or a mushroom capped squiggle beast (penis).

If you're triggered by words not being inclusive enough, get yourself to a psychiatrist stat. You have serious problems. Words are for communication. Not to make you feel good about anything. Including how you identify.

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.