The Supreme Court unanimously sided with Trump after the state of Colorado tried to kick him off the primary ballot, claiming that Article 3 barred “insurrectionists” from holding office. Subsequently, SCOTUS ruled that only Congress has the power to enforce Section 3.

"One of the chilling things about this is that they would not have been able to keep Trump off the ballot if he was the nominee, and they knew that," Gerald A said. "But keeping him off the primary ballot can swing it so that a candidate like Niki Haley can stay in the race and make it look like she has a lot of support."

The court ruled right before Super Tuesday, which is tomorrow, March 5.

"It would have been one thing if it was a split decision - it is not even close. That tells you a lot," Crowder said. The issue is relevant because everyone, including people who don't honor the Constitution, and who don't honor originalism, said that this is a bridge too far. There isn't even one dissent. That is a miracle."

SCOTUS also ruled last week that they agreed to decide whether Trump has immunity from prosecution over allegations that he conspired to overturn the 2020 election. The court will hear those arguments in April on and likley decided whether he had presidential immunity.

"The three branches act as checks and balances with each other. The Left does not want checks and balances," Crowder said. "What would happen if the DNC had power completely unfettered? The election would not be an election. It would be a coronation of somebody nobody wants.”

Although the vote was unanimous, the three liberal justices said that SCOTUS went too far when it laid out how Section 3 may be enforced. Nonetheless, the outcome of the case remains the same.

"They did this to try and set the way for swing states to be able to do it," Crowder said. "If not for the Supreme Court, it would have worked.”