×
Please verify
Each day we overwhelm your brains with the content you've come to love from the Louder with Crowder Dot Com website.
But Facebook is...you know, Facebook. Their algorithm hides our ranting and raving as best it can. The best way to stick it to Zuckerface?
Sign up for the LWC News Blast! Get your favorite right-wing commentary delivered directly to your inbox!
ArticlesAugust 12, 2024
Watch: Secret Service agent breaks into a salon before a Kamala event, then does something shocking
Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.
It’s unclear where the Secret Service found the nerve to be as abysmal as they currently are, but DEI certainly seems to exaggerate that issue. Additionally, if you look at all the legal documents in the history of legal papers, nowhere does it say that agents can disregard private property rights to use the restroom conveniently and nowhere does it say they are exempt from prosecution the moment they break the law. However, that may be exactly what we have here.
Secret Service agents broke into a Massachusetts salon by picking the lock and we know they know what they did was wrong because they also covered the security camera with duct tape and the only time people do that is when they are intentionally breaking the law.
Secret Service broke into a Massachusetts hair salon during a Kamala event. They covered the cameras with duct tape and broke inside to use the bathroom, let other attendees use the bathroom, and took candies off the desk.
They reportedly left the store unlocked and left the… pic.twitter.com/JYbiUqo2Zv
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 11, 2024
According to The Post Millennial :
Alicia Powers, the owner of the salon, recounted how Secret Service agents entered her building without prior notice by picking the lock to the front door and taping over the security cameras. The agents let the public use the bathroom for nearly two hours and left the premises unlocked after they were done.
"They had a bunch of people in and out of here doing a couple of bomb sweeps again – totally understand what they have to do, due to the nature of the situation," Powers explained to Business Insider. "And at that point, my team felt like it was a little bit chaotic, and we just made the decision to close for Saturday."
This is the Secret Service agent who covered cameras on a hair salon with duct tape then broke into the store so Kamala rally attendees can use the bathroom.
Who is she? pic.twitter.com/NvHIwec4Ip
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) August 11, 2024
After the incident was made public, the Secret Service reached out to Powers, and the agency’s Boston office issued an apology. A spokesperson for the Secret Service told Fox News, "The US Secret Service works closely with our partners in the business community to carry out our protective and investigative missions. The Secret Service has since communicated with the affected business owner.”
"We hold these relationships in the highest regard and our personnel would not enter, or instruct our partners to enter, a business without the owner’s permission,” the agency added.
To call this ghetto would be an understatement.
According to the business owner, they didn't have permission to use the establishment as they pleased, which is proven by the fact that they broke in and covered the camera with tape.
Typically, when you have permission to do something you don’t have to hide it or pick locks.
Why do Secret Service agents get away with things normal Americans would be prosecuted for? The fact that they covered up the camera is extremely troubling and in a serious country, they would be held accountable. But we are no longer living in serious times and you don’t need to be this little thing called “competent” when working with the Secret Service.
Are the DEI agents so incredibly stupid they don’t even understand basic laws like private property rights? It would appear so, as they don’t even know about this little thing called the “Third Amendment”. You would also think that knowing the Constitution before taking an oath to protect it would be the most basic requirement but even that’s too much for people hired solely based on insignificant birth traits.
It does not matter if this was done by the most ignorant but innocent of ways, they broke their oaths and these people should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.
- YouTubewww.youtube.com
Latest
Don't Miss