Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled that Texas could enforce a law allowing state authorities to arrest and deport illegals. Not even 24 hours after that, the ruling was blocked by a federal appeals court in the late hours of the night.

But the question remains: Does a state have a right to defend its citizens if the federal government is not doing its job?

Today’s show breaks it down.

SB 4 would make it a state crime to illegally cross the border into Texas. It gives local police the power to detain and/or arrest those they reasonably believe don’t have the proper documentation to enter this country.

Texas believes this law is necessary because the federal government is not doing much of anything to stop the flow of illegals at the border.

Under Trump, there were 11 terrorists caught at the Southern Border during his entire term. So far under Biden, there have been 340.

"Based on [the federal government's] metrics, it could easily double that," Gerald A said. “But 340 is bad enough.”

USA Today wants you to believe there is no correlation between illegal immigration and crime and that there is nothing to worry about.

The homicide rate by illegals is also 1,500 percent higher under Biden than under Trump.

"If we cannot find common ground on the legitimate purview of the federal government... wouldn't enforcing national security be the only reason?" Crowder said. “If not, I would argue that you support anarchy.”

Texas feels it has to do the federal government's job. However, the federal government believes that this “undermines foreign relations and injures its sovereign interest in enforcing federal law."

"You cannot hold that 'all cultures are created equal, there is no superior country, and everyone has a birthright to come to the United States if they want to,'” Crowder said. “When it is not based on principle - progressive [policies] for progressive sake always unravels. It can never be consistent.”