California may have a law that will allow the state to confiscate legally owned guns... from people who haven't even broken the law. But if someone thinks you might break a law, California will take your guns. Yes, really. Read the background of how the law came about here.

These are the bolts and carrier groups...

Under the law, a judge has the power to grant a restraining order telling police to seize a person’s guns, based solely on accounts from family members or police that the person is poses an imminent danger to others. The restraining order can be granted without the affected person knowing it exists or being allowed time to contest it. Under the law, the factors a judge can consider in granting the restraining order include not only threats of violence, but also prior felony arrests (even without a conviction), evidence of alcohol abuse, and even the simple act of recently purchasing a gun or ammunition.

Once granted, police can use the restraining order to confiscate all of a person’s guns and ammunition, and the person is also barred from buying or possessing guns and ammo for the duration of the order. A full court hearing must then be heard within three weeks. At that hearing, a judge will be able to extend the restraining order for an entire year.

If you're standing up in your chair going "YAY, California is doing something about gun violence!" then please harm yourself. Badly. Do it now.

If you decided to ignore my advice and find yourself still here, please read the bold text again. I bolded it so you could just scan it. That's how much I care.

Also, read this piece about how Liberal California HAS Strict Gun Control. The Facts... We're talking strictest gun control in the country. Not coincidentally, some of the highest rates of crime in the country.

Now, let's read something else. It's short, but I bolded the important part for you. Again, because I care.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

One of these things is not like the other. Maybe you're confused because I told you to harm yourself and you did. Therefore I'll explain it in clear terms. You cannot punish someone and infringe on their right to keep and bear arms just because you think they might do something mean or break a law. Because your opinion isn't fact. It's just your opinion. It's also hearsay. That's a legal term meaning "rumors," which are usually inadmissable in court. Because people have rights. Not anymore!

This also isn't a Spielberg movie where short  (albeit handsome) police men, prevent crimes before they happen. That's not how it works. We're living in the real world, not a SciFi adventure universe. I don't care how close we are to self-driving cars.

This is exactly what leftists try to do. They're counting on gullibility and the casual throwaway phrase "common sense gun control." Because at first glance, taking away someone's guns, if someone else thinks they might commit a crime, sounds "reasonable." Until you start thinking about how we define "think they might commit a crime"? Also note the law says even the mere act of buying up guns and ammo can trigger this law. So if someone you've pissed off finds out you're buying guns and ammo, he/she/ze can call the police on your sorry, privileged, cis-gendered ass. They'll come and take your guns away.

I promise you, I tell the truth. Click the reference links, all of the information is accounted for. If you still don't think this is a slippery slope, that the government won't abuse this law (LOL), go harm yourself again. As many times as possible.

Then familiarize yourself with the Second Amendment and why it exists with the video below. You need it.