Debate moderators love Hillary like Bill loves interns (see TOP 5 Lester Holt Hillary-Shilling Moments). So last night's debate? Twas no exception. The moderators threw shame to the wind and tried to pave the path for Hillary to make her "arguments." Except Trump opted not to be silenced, so instead, the moderators got steamrolled by a barrage of words and sniffles. The Trump campaign released a video showing the highlights below...

Look, Trump doesn't always have the best debates, and this isn't the first time he's accused something of being rigged. Still, Hillary has a habit of rigging things in her favor. Hence the fact that she's running for President despite the world hateing her. Also, she's a criminal. Just a few insignificant details, according to the mainstream media.

Moderators are just referees for words. You'd think it would be a simple job. Pose the important questions and give each person a fair shot at talking. Also, stay neutral, or "moderate." Get it? That's what makes a moderator a moderator. Instead, Martha Raddatz ends up sounding like a nagging mom. Though to be fair, "moderating" Trump and Hillary is a lot like herding cats. Cats wearing toupees and pantsuits, that is.

Turns out people are sick of the political games. That's why many aren't voting for the cackling hag (see #NotWithHer? Hillary Clinton Losing to Donald Trump in Latest CNN Poll...). Seems like the more she tries to get people to like her, the less appealing she is to the voting base. Her solution? Pull a few strings. Or a hundred. Or just pull all the strings. Because what difference, at this point, does it make?

By the way, notice how Hillary still can't win a debate even after moderators give her every chance to make her case? The pantsuit itself could have shown up without her and it would be more convincing.

Just another reason why we can't have Miss Moonface for President. Speaking of which...

NOT SUBSCRIBED TO THE PODCAST? FIX THAT! IT’S COMPLETELY FREE ON BOTH ITUNES HERE AND SOUNDCLOUD HERE.