It’s foolish to acquiesce to the pronoun train, to begin with. That’s one thing. But it’s a whole other level that officers even begin to care about “affirming” the feelings of violent criminals. Well, at least that is what the Metro Vancouver Transit Police did.

Police found semen at the scene of a sexual assault. But despite that, the department is insisting that they are just flabbergasted as to what the gender of the suspected perpetrator is.

Transit Police seek public’s assistance in identifying sexual assault suspectwww.youtube.com

According to Reduxx:

The Metro Vancouver Transit Police say they “don’t know” if the primary suspect in a skytrain sexual assault is male or female despite having recovered semen during the investigation.

On February 8, the Transit Police issued a press release pleading for help to identify the suspect. While photos and videos showed what appeared to be a male with long hair, some basic information on the suspect was curiously omitted from the release. No pronouns were used, and no information on the suspect’s sex was included.

In a recorded phone call with journalist Amy Hamm, Constable Amanda Steed said the information had been intentionally left out because the Transit Police were unsure of how to refer to the suspect.

“We’ve left it out for a reason; it’s because we don’t know. The video evidence shows someone who… would appear female, who is female presenting, but the physical evidence is that of a genetic male,” Steed said. She later confirmed in an email to Reduxx that the physical evidence is in fact the suspect’s semen.

The video evidence most certainly does not show someone who "appears female." That is a blatant lie.

It’s insane that officers even care about being "inclusive" in regards to a rapist. But that is progressivism for you. Treat criminals as some sort of victim rather than the victims themselves.

If it looks like a duck. Quacks like a duck. Waddles like a duck. Then it's a duck! You don't even need the semen evidence to tell that that is a man in biker shorts.

“The suspect we believe does have a penis,” said Steed, when asked if the victim was raped. “But the video shows someone who appears to be female presenting, so that’s why we left the gender out. Because we weren’t really sure how this person identifies—we didn’t want to get it wrong.”

Oh, and the unknown gendered person also is "believed to have a penis." You really cannot make this level of insanity up.

This man committed one of the most evil acts an individual can do. But the priority is making sure that the suspected rapist is correctly "affirmed."

But did the rapist "affirm" the request of the victim when she said no? Because I beg to differ.

We have gotten to the point that "affirming" in itself is a mind virus.

That said, the only thing we know for sure is that that is a man in a wig. And anyone who disagree should be fired for stupid beyond reason.

WTF: Is This The Dumbest Cop Ever?www.youtube.com