Subscribe to Louder with Crowder on Rumble! Download the app on Apple and Google Play.

In a serious society, people like Tim Walz and Kamala Harris would be banned from running for office solely because they don’t believe in Free Speech. But we don’t live in a serious country and no one blinks an eye that two candidates no one voted for may become the most powerful duo in the world and they believe in policing your thoughts.

RFK Jr. has been vocal about the Democratic party being the antithesis of Democracy and claims it’s “disqualifying” for a candidate to attack free speech.

When citizens start fearing the government for being politically incorrect, that’s a clear sign things have gotten out of hand. And the only problem with hate speech is that hate is subjective and you cannot police people’s feelings, while it’s also morally permissible to hate a lot of things.

America used to be the leader of the Free world and now we have a de facto president who could care less about the constitution. These people don’t think you should decide who the nominee is for either party. First, they tried to take Trump off the ballot and then they took Biden off the ballot, and then they are also taking third-party candidates off the ballot. These people could not get more undemocratic if they tried.

Question: If every candidate they don’t support is taken off the ballot what’s the point of even having elections?

The Kamala campaign has solely based its platform on lies and it's so bad that even CNN had to fact-check them for "repeatedly deceived with misleading edits and captions."

It's pretty comical that the people claiming they want to monitor misinformation are the biggest offenders. That's because progressivism and projection go hand-in-hand. Every time these people point the finger they are almost always talking about themselves.

In a sane society, Kamala would be disqualified for attacking your freedoms but we don't and she might become the most powerful person in the world.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com