Well, Todd Nickerson the pedophile has responded to the "right wing vile" backlash he got for coming out to the world as someone who's sexually attracted to children. Sorry I'm not sorry. If you're sexually attracted to children, you're a sick bastard. And not one for whom I have much, shall we say "tolerance"?

He called me out by name..ish:

Then there’s Alex Crowder’s lunacy by way of Alex Jones: No, Salon.com, I Don’t Need to ‘Understand’ the Plight of Pedophiles. Again, the implication in the very title is that somehow kids are protected by willful ignorance. What reality does Crowder live in where things are made better by refusing to understand them? Never mind that his solution to sex offenders is to shoot them in the head, which goes beyond even the Old Testament law of an eye for an eye and warrants a comparison to the Nazis (who did execute sex offenders—not to mention the disabled—alongside gays and Jews); his solution to even confessing the attraction is exile from society. As if I haven’t already largely exiled myself. Seriously, ask my friends and family; I’m a notorious recluse who only ventures into public when absolutely necessary.

Firstly, it's Steven Crowder. If you're going to insult me, do it properly. Secondly, I think Paul Joseph Watson posted the article at InfoWars, which I understand to be run by Alex Jones. I have no actual affiliation. Okay? Okay. Thirdly, I find it hilarious that this PEDOPHILE is looking down his nose at a filthy "right winger" like me. This tells you everything you need to know about the left. Being Conservative is literally viewed as more offensive than the fondling of children (allegedly). And comparing himself to the helpless Jews of Nazi Germany? Talk about a victim complex. You know who's more helpless/victimized than pedophiles? The kids they rape, en masse. Crazy, I know!

Fourthly, and most importantly, Todd here is actually wrong about my assertion. I totally understand pedophiles. That's why I advocated they be shot. See? But again, context matters. I never said that anyone with pedophile-like thoughts should be shot. What I said was...

I still have a steadfast rule: touch a kid sexually and you deserve a bullet. 

And I won't walk that back. I stand by it. Crazily enough, it seems that "Todd" may have very well done this himself. Yep, I've done some research. Behold the beauty of the internet:

Allow me to present some more from his message board posts here. (special thanks to Reginald Harper who assisted in finding these posts)

I particularly like the one where he calls critics of pedophiles "bigots." Right below the post where he admits to TOUCHING A LITTLE GIRL!

*UPDATE and this may be a smoking gun here. In the Salon.com article, Todd wrote

"For better or worse—mostly worse—we have this sexuality, and unlike with most sexualities, there is no ethical way we can fully actualize our sexual longings.  Our desires and feelings, if we are to remain upright, are doomed from the outset. "

That's odd... especially when contrasted with what he himself, wrote right here on this message board.

More importantly, yes, he is still a twisted bag of human fecal-matter. You can read more about this research, including prior screen-names, claims and quotes here (WARNING: PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIAL AT LINK).

Here's the crazy thing, in my original article, I actually never advocated the execution of men with pedophile-like thoughts. I advocated that they be removed from society so that they can no longer can harm children.

Once you start sexualizing children, you’ve crossed that point. I’m sure some of you pedophiles have had some really tough breaks in life too. That’s sad. I don’t care. Once you become a threat to our kids (and yes, any sexual attraction to a 10 year old is to be seen as a threat), you are no longer welcome in society. Period. Gone. Done. No talking. No understanding. You’re out.

The only counseling session you get is with a cocked hammer and a three second count-down giving you a headstart to flee the village.

Again, I 100% stand by my position. I'll walk it back precisely zero. Our duty is to protect our children first. Helping pedophiles feel better about themselves appears waaaaaaaay further down the list. Like, a billion spots lower. It's not even a cameo at that point. But I understand we can't execute somebody for thoughts. Here's what's nuts... this Todd guy seems to be guilty of more than just thoughts. Even worse, he seems to (allegedly) have a past of of advocating for "pro-contact" pedophilia.

A guy like that, yes, deserves to be punished severely. I have no doubt if it were my daughter he'd fondled, I'd want him executed. Sound harsh? Do any parents out there feel any differently?

Finally, my issues is not as much with this sick, hobbling bag of excrement as it is with Salon.com. Why are they so hell-bent on normalizing pedophilia? This is the second time they've given a pedophile a platform to sell his sob story. Does Salon.com KNOW that Todd may be an active, pro-contact pedophile? Shouldn't they launch an investigation? I mean, this is criminal. And not like "oh he called me a tranny" hate-speech, criminal, but really criminal.

Final note: want to know just how far leftist, situational-ethics have taken us? Well, this same pedophile complained when Jimmy Kimmel pulled a Halloween prank on his show that made a couple kids cry.

I know, I know. You just can't make this stuff up. Pranking is worse than raping kids. The irony's so rich, it'll give you gout.